Skip Navigation

Journal of Refugee Studies 2005 18(4):454-467; doi:10.1093/refuge/fei040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, E.
Right arrow Articles by Foldspang, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Refugee Studies Vol. 18, No. 4 © The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Articles

Predictors of the Authorities' Decision to Grant Asylum in Denmark

Edith Montgomery

Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims (RCT), Copenhagen, Denmark

Anders Foldspang

Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark em{at}rct.dk

With the aim of identifying predictors for being granted a residence permit, adult members of 149 refugee families from the Middle East answered a structured interview shortly after arrival on social and demographic background and family exposure to organized violence. At follow-up, 90 families (60.4 per cent) had been granted a residence permit. This was positively associated with Iraqi nationality, with the duration of the father's education and the family's religion being another than Islam, and negatively with being a single mother family. No association was found with exposure to war, having lived in a refugee camp or to human rights violations. Without transparency of the asylum granting decision process the conclusion is that this seems to favour the selection of socially and culturally well situated refugees, while human rights violations seem to play a diminishing role. In order to develop its quality, continuous and transparent monitoring of the asylum granting decision process appears relevant.


MS received June 2004; revised MS received May 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
S. Tannock
Immigration, education and the new caste society in Britain
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2009; 29(2): 243 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.