Skip Navigation

Journal of Refugee Studies 2005 18(2):181-198; doi:10.1093/refuge/fei020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghorashi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Refugee Studies Vol. 18, No. 2 © The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Articles

Agents of Change or Passive Victims: The Impact of Welfare States (the Case of the Netherlands) on Refugees

Halleh Ghorashi

Department of Culture, Organization and Management, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam h.ghorashi{at}fsw.vu.nl

This paper explores the impact of a regulated society such as the Netherlands on the lives of refugees in general and on those of Iranian women refugees in particular. Two periods are distinguished in regard to Dutch asylum policies: the 1980s and post-1990. For the 1980s when refugee reception was less restricted, I use empirical material collected between 1995 and 2000. The women I interviewed during this period were leftist activists involved in the Iranian revolution of 1979 and had to leave Iran because of their political backgrounds. The material used for the post-1990 or more restricted period, is mainly from secondary sources, supplemented by occasional, informal visits to asylum seeker centres. The paper argues that a strict refugee policy—especially the policy that was put in place during the 1990s—has a direct effect on the affected refugees by making them dependents of the state. These restricted policies reinforce the image of refugees as problems in society and have an effect, albeit less direct, on the lives of the refugees who arrived prior to the 1990s and who are now Dutch citizens.


1. For safety reasons and to protect the anonymity of the women interviewed, names used in this piece are pseudonyms.

2. In January 1999, according to the Central Bureau of Statistics, 19,022 first-generation Iranians and 1,602 second-generation Iranians were registered in the Netherlands. The statistics do not differentiate by sex. Thus, the number of Iranian women in the Netherlands is a rough estimate based on my own observation. The number also excludes Iranians (both with and without refugee status) living in the asylum seeker centres or COA (Central Opvang Asiekzoekers). In August 1999, according to COA, 4,053 Iranians were living in the asylum seeker centres. This number, however, does not include non-registered Iranians. For this reason the actual number is higher than the officially recorded numbers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
P. Smets and S. ten Kate
Let's Meet! Let's Exchange! LETS as an Instrument for Linking Asylum Seekers and the Host Community in the Netherlands
Journal of Refugee Studies, September 1, 2008; 21(3): 326 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.