Skip Navigation

Journal of Refugee Studies 2003 16(3):253-273; doi:10.1093/jrs/16.3.253
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thielemann, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Between Interests and Norms: Explaining Burden-Sharing in the European Union

Eiko R. Thielemann1

1 Department of Government and European Institute, LSE, London, UK

International burden-sharing, that is, the question how costs of common initiatives or the provision of public goods should be shared between states, raises two important questions. First, the question of motivation. How do we explain calls for burden-sharing beyond the state? Second, the question of patterns. How can one account for the unequal distribution of burdens across countries that one observes? In order to address these questions, the first part of the paper proposes and analyses two burden-sharing approaches—one based on a ‘cost–benefit logic’, the other on a ‘norm-based’ logic—that offer partly competing and partly complementary hypotheses for answering these two questions. The second part analyses EU attempts to share burdens in the area of forced migration in order to test these hypotheses empirically. The results suggest that although there is still little evidence for inter-state solidarity in the EU, norm-based approaches can nonetheless offer a powerful account of European burden-sharing in the area of forced migration.


Received May 2002. Revised April 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
P. Hynes
Contemporary Compulsory Dispersal and the Absence of Space for the Restoration of Trust
Journal of Refugee Studies, March 1, 2009; 22(1): 97 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
A. Betts and J.-F. Durieux
Convention Plus as a Norm-Setting Exercise
Journal of Refugee Studies, September 1, 2007; 20(3): 509 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
T. J. Hatton
European Asylum Policy
National Institute Economic Review, October 1, 2005; 194(1): 106 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
E. Neumayer
Asylum Destination Choice: What Makes Some West European Countries More Attractive Than Others?
European Union Politics, June 1, 2004; 5(2): 155 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.