Skip Navigation

Journal of Refugee Studies 2003 16(2):186-201; doi:10.1093/jrs/16.2.186
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollack, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Returning to a Safe Area? The Importance of Burial for Return to Srebrenica

Craig Evan Pollack1

1 School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco

Repatriation and burial were intimately linked in the minds of survivors from Srebrenica, Bosnia-Herzegovina. A United Nations ‘Safe Area’, Srebrenica was attacked in 1995 by the Serb military who, in the process, displaced tens of thousands of people and caused the disappearance of over 7,000 men. Five years after the assault, survivors considered returning to their prewar homes. Simultaneously, they lobbied the government to bury the bodies of the people massacred in Srebrenica. Qualitative interviews with 37 displaced people along with 30 people working for local, national, and international organizations performed over the summer of 2000 suggest that the repatriation and burial were fundamentally connected. Power relations with the Serbs, uncertainty over the implementation of land laws, and the lack of security framed both issues. This study argues that burial was perceived by those interviewed to promote repatriation; it was a way of obtaining information about conditions in the homeland and a test of their rights and citizenship. Ultimately, burial strengthens ties to the homeland by creating both physical and symbolic reasons to return. The results suggest more generally the need for the international community to coordinate efforts aimed at identification, burial and repatriation after human rights abuses.


Received September 2001. Revised January 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.