Skip Navigation

Journal of Refugee Studies 2002 15(1):1-25; doi:10.1093/jrs/15.1.1
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nadig, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Smuggling, National Security, and Refugee Protection

Aninia Nadig1

1 Working Group on International Refugee Policy, Netherlands

This paper examines human smuggling to the European Union in the 1990s. It argues that the increase in human smuggling and the development of restrictive access policies to EU states are interlinked and reinforce each other. Human smuggling, one very important aspect of irregular migration, is widely described as a threat to the security of a receiving country. This paper makes a theory-based argument for approaching irregular migration in a radically different way by taking it off the national security agenda. This would allow for a more long-term and Europe-wide approach toward irregular migration, while refugees' rights of access to protection would be respected and receiving societies would experience foreigners as less stressful than they do now. Human smuggling is examined through the lens of three International Relations theories: realism, critical security studies, and pluralism. Realism best reflects today's perception of human smuggling as a threat to a state, and that state's self-interest to protect itself; ‘state’ and ‘self-interest’ are its central concepts. Critical security studies recognize that ‘danger’ and ‘threat’ are constructs of each society, reflected in government policies. The theory thus includes societal factors in its analysis, while accepting a nation's interest in protecting itself from perceived threats. Pluralism, finally, identifies the state as pluralist and integrative of sub- and supranational forces, best capable to respond to a complex and multi-layered problem such as human smuggling.


Received September 2001. Revised March 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
D. Bogner, J. Herlihy, and C. R. Brewin
Impact of sexual violence on disclosure during Home Office interviews
The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 191(1): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
E. Montgomery and A. Foldspang
Predictors of the Authorities' Decision to Grant Asylum in Denmark
Journal of Refugee Studies, December 1, 2005; 18(4): 454 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.