Skip Navigation

Journal of Refugee Studies 2001 14(2):95-134; doi:10.1093/jrs/14.2.95
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barutciski, M.
Right arrow Articles by Suhrke, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Lessons from the Kosovo Refugee Crisis: Innovatons in Protection and Burden-sharing

Michael Barutciski1 and Astri Suhrke

1 Université Panthéon-Assas Paris II 2 Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway

One of the central policy challenges of the Kosovo refugee crisis was to persuade neighbouring Macedonia to admit a massive influx of refugees that the government initially rejected. The eventual solution was based on a ‘burden-sharing’ scheme involving the transfer of refugees to other countries. Human rights activists criticized the establishment of sharing as a pre-condition because they believed that such a compromise on the principle of unconditional asylum would further accelerate the restrictive policies of states towards refugees. Others argued that the Macedonian position was a political fact that had to be recognized and that a pragmatic response was necessary to avert a humanitarian disaster at the border. These two approaches clashed as states and international organizations tried to deal with the emergency. The article proposes a third approach that in some measure reconciles the opposing camps. It explains that there is a legal case for not considering first asylum as an unconditioned obligation on all states in all refugee situations, and that there in a moral-political case for encouraging states to share refugees for whom they feel they have a special responsibility. The recognition of such exceptional situations can strengthen the international refugee regime. The Kocovo emergency suggests that a clearly exceptional situation where burden-sharing can be considered imperative is when vulnerable states are faced with a mass influx of refugees that may export the conflict and lead to serious destabilization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
L. A. ZEAGER and J. H. P. WILLIAMS
Tools for Anticipating Asylum Denials: An Application to Afghan Refugees in Pakistan, 1997-2001
Journal of Refugee Studies, December 1, 2006; 19(4): 453 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.