Skip Navigation

Journal of Refugee Studies 2000 13(2):184-204; doi:10.1093/jrs/13.2.184
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HASSAN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Deterrence Measures and the Preservation of Asylum in the United Kingdom and United States

LISA HASSAN

Cardiff Law Centre Splott, Cardiff, UK

This paper examines the concept of ‘deterrence’ in relation to states' policies towards asylum seekers and refugees. States ostensibly use deterrence measures, such as detention or the withdrawal of welfare benefits, in an effort to preserve asylum for the benefit of the ‘bona fide’ refugee. That is, asylum can only be maintained if the abusers of the system are removed from the equation. The author argues that it cannot be possible for states to pre-determine who is a ‘genuine’ refugee, and states such as the UK and US use deterrence policies, not to cater to refugees' interests, but to serve their own. It is argued that states implement deterrence measures to reduce the numbers of applicants for asylum overall, regardless of their validity; to save money; to criminalize aliens and discourage permanent settlement; and to conciliate certain sectors of the public and reassert state legitimacy. The author reviews the costs of such policies and suggests five possible alternatives to these highly contentious measures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
L. C. Keith and J. S. Holmes
A Rare Examination of Typically Unobservable Factors in US Asylum Decisions
Journal of Refugee Studies, June 1, 2009; 22(2): 224 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Transcultural PsychiatryHome page
D. Silove, P. Austin, and Z. Steel
No Refuge from Terror: The Impact of Detention on the Mental Health of Trauma-affected Refugees Seeking Asylum in Australia
Transcultural Psychiatry, September 1, 2007; 44(3): 359 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International Social WorkHome page
L. Briskman and S. Cemlyn
Reclaiming humanity for asylum-seekers: A social work response
International Social Work, November 1, 2005; 48(6): 714 - 724.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.